RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00870 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be changed to reflect “Reduction in Force” at the convenience of the government. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 is in error. He separated under the FY07 Air Force “Force Shaping” initiative and Block 28 of his DD 214 does not reflect this fact. Based on the current reason listed, he was denied access to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Home Loan program. This is unjust. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, AF Form 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, AF Form 973, Change of Administrative Order, Proof of Service Letter, dated 8 Dec 06, Separation Approval rip, dated 5 Sep 06 and a Limited Active Duty Service Commitment (LADSC) Waiver Staff Summary Sheet, signed by his Wing Commander, dated 25 Jul 06. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 16 Feb 05. On 30 Dec 06, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve for completion of his Military Service Obligation. He was credited with 1 year, 10 months, and 15 days of active service. His DD Form 214 reflects the narrative reason for separation as “Miscellaneous/General Reasons.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. In accordance with Military Personnel Flight Memorandum (MPFM) 06-50, Air Force - Force Shaping Program FY07, dated 26 Jul 06, personnel who separate under the LADSC Waiver Program will do so under the miscellaneous provisions of AFI 36-3207, Separating Commissioned Officers, Chapter 2, paragraph 2.4.17. Therefore, the Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of “FND” and the corresponding narrative reason for separation (Miscellaneous General Reasons) on his DD Form 214 are correct and in accordance with the Air Force guidelines and instructions. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00870 in Executive Session on 26 Feb 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Feb 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 17 Apr 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 14.